When you’re talking engineering colleges, names like MIT and Stanford pop up.  When you think of technology you really think about Silicon Valley in the Bay Area of California.  You may even think about Cambridge, MA (its a little less known but still important startup bed).

Well, considering the prestige of those colleges is it any wonder that all the industry sticks around?  But honestly, is it really the academics themselves that are creating those entrepreneurs?  The video bellow has an interesting thought…

What’s the interesting thought?  Not that these colleges have good academics (for there are quite a few colleges with just as good if not better academics), but rather that they work with their students after graduating, not finding jobs, but creating them.  The universities encourage their students to start their own companies and work with their students in licensing of intellectual property, and encourage their professors to consult for the new companies being created by students.

Honestly, when you look at it, that’s quite brilliant, and it seems to work.

That’s scores different from how my college is (they claim ownership of all of my classwork with no ability for me to license it back, and the very thought of me F/OSS’ing my graduate thesis is obscene).  I guess we know who’s method works better….

Ok here’s the scoop.  I’m starting work on a Linux distro meant to be run as a live OS with persistent changes on a USB flash drive.  The distro is targeted at Computer Science students so they can take the distro with them.  I’m debating building it as a desktop OS as well to be used as a primary distro.

The basic jist is that the distro is meant to be run on lab computers in CS departments and allow access to university resources.  These include things like Windows/CIFS shares, Zephyr/XMPP, and things like that.

Here are some of my current ideas

• Window Managers

e17

Great window manager, just currently unstable

KDE

Already built into the package manager I’m thinking of using, seems to be a dev favorite

GNOME

Stable and simple

• Programming Software

  • emacs/vim (both graphical and console versions)
  • Various programming language integration versions for above editors
  • GNU Compiler Collection (the whole thing, C, ADA, Java, etc)
  • Java JDK (depending on redistribution licensing but it shouldn’t be a problem)
  • Eclipse and Netbeans IDEs with various plugins
  • gdb/DDD
  • dtrace (depending on usability)
  • Various other compilers like GHC and SBCL
  • Developer tools for AIs and such (CommonLisp and PROLOG stuff)

• Usability Software

  • OpenOffice 3.1
  • Compression software (tar, unrar, 7zip, etc)
  • OpenSSH (obviously)
  • Firefox
  • Rhythmbox

• Math Software

  • Maxima
  • IT++
  • GNU libmatheval
  • Octave

• Documentation

  • Free Documentation and tutorials for programming languages and theory
  • Software to cache web pages locally so they can be pulled up without an internet connection

• Security Software

grsecurity/PAX

Help mitigate attacks against the system and also has the added benefit of forcing the CS Student to code properly and prevents them from doing stuff they shouldn’t be doing

SELinux

Again, helps mitigate attacks and prevents the user from doing things with code that he shouldn’t be doing

ClamAV/chkrootkit/rkhunter

Just in case

• Package Managers

Nix

I have a preference for Nix because its purely functional (id est, non-destructive) which will help mitigate issues with dependency hell, and also allow easy rollback to previously working software if testing new versions. My issue is that because its purely functional, it’ll use up a lot of drive space. Flash drives should be large enough where this isn’t an issue, but there would probably be the need for a cleanup script that’ll clean out older versions

Pacman

This one is good because its on a rolling release system and has lots of packages (pacman is Arch Linux’s package manager), it just doesn’t offer the flexibility of Nix

APT

There’s always Debian’s package manager. It could prove to be difficult, however, to run this on a rolling release system because of how its designed. Preferably stay away from this package manager and other staged release package managers

If you like where this is headed, you can help out or you can at least give me some ideas for the OS.  Included software, underlying systems, stuff like that.  Obviously I’d like to use as much F/OSS code as humanly possible.  I’m not opposed to stepping outside of the bounds of F/OSS, but due to licensing regarding redistribution, I figure it’ll be a heck of a lot less of a headache.